显示标签为“Takeover”的博文。显示所有博文
显示标签为“Takeover”的博文。显示所有博文

2011年4月19日星期二

J & J - Synthes Takeover obscuring withdrawals in Makeover: M & A Real

反序列化操作“Translate”的响应消息的正文时出现错误。读取 XML 数据时,超出最大字符串内容长度配额 (8192)。通过更改在创建 XML 读取器时所使用的 XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas 对象的 MaxStringContentLength 属性,可增加此配额。 第 2 行,位置为 8297。
反序列化操作“Translate”的响应消息的正文时出现错误。读取 XML 数据时,超出最大字符串内容长度配额 (8192)。通过更改在创建 XML 读取器时所使用的 XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas 对象的 MaxStringContentLength 属性,可增加此配额。 第 1 行,位置为 8881。
April 18, 2011, 10:23 PM EDT By Tara Lachapelle and Alex Nussbaum

April 19 (Bloomberg) -- Johnson & Johnson, reeling from more than 50 drug and device recalls since the start of 2010, is trying to recapture its younger self by digesting Synthes Inc.

Synthes, the largest maker of devices to treat bone fractures and trauma, has an operating margin of 35 percent, the highest among medical-products makers including J&J with market values of more than $5 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Synthes has increased the amount of net income generated per dollar of revenue for seven straight years to the best in the industry, while J&J’s profit margin declined in two of the past four years, the data show.

J&J, with almost $28 billion in cash at its disposal, is in talks to acquire Synthes, a $19.4-billion company with only $98 million in debt, as it seeks to revive its image after product recalls and lawsuits over failed artificial hips. The world’s second-biggest maker of health-care products would gain a device company with almost 50 percent of the trauma market. Synthes’s operating margins are 45 percent higher than Smith & Nephew Plc, which investors had speculated was a target for J&J.

“J&J had a severe challenge to its premier reputation given all the recalls,” said Michael Holland, who oversees more than $4 billion, including J&J shares, as chairman of Holland & Co. in New York. “This relatively bold step to buy a premier company is a significant move to regain their luster.”

Share Gains

J&J’s shares rose as much as 1 percent yesterday before closing down 0.2 percent at $60.46 on the New York Stock Exchange. That was still the third-best performance in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, which slid 1.1 percent as Standard & Poor’s cut its outlook on U.S. long-term debt to “negative.”

Synthes advanced for the ninth straight day in Zurich, climbing 5.6 percent to 146.5 Swiss francs to give it a market value of 17.4 billion Swiss francs ($19.4 billion). The West Chester, Pennsylvania-based company said in a statement that it’s in talks with J&J about a possible combination. Synthes doesn’t intend to provide more information until a definitive agreement is reached or talks are terminated, it said.

William Price, a spokesman for New Brunswick, New Jersey- based J&J, declined to comment in an e-mail.

J&J is considering an acquisition of Synthes after product recalls cost the company $900 million in sales last year. J&J removed almost 200 million packages of Tylenol, Motrin and other over-the-counter medications tainted by nauseating odors or improper ingredients. Its DePuy unit has also withdrawn 93,000 hip implants that failed at higher-than-expected rates, forcing repeat surgeries.

‘Change the Focus’

After the company’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare unit was charged on March 10 with violating U.S. law, the Food & Drug Administration expanded oversight of three manufacturing plants for at least five years. The settlement doesn’t preclude future criminal charges, the agency said at the time.

“They want to change the focus of the conversation,” said Erik Gordon, a University of Michigan business professor in Ann Arbor who studies the biomedical industry. J&J is “probably thinking, ‘Let’s have the conversation be the potential upside of something,’” he said.

While Synthes and J&J may “fit together,” J&J should be focused on fixing its in-house recall problems, he said.

Synthes had an operating margin of 35 percent in 2010, the best among 17 medical-product companies with market values greater than $5 billion, including J&J at 27 percent, data compiled by Bloomberg show. The company’s efficiency turning revenue into operating income also topped rivals specializing in medical instruments such as Minneapolis-based Medtronic Inc., St. Jude Medical Inc. in St. Paul, Minnesota, and Boston Scientific Corp. in Natick, Massachusetts.

‘Great Margins’

Synthes improved its profit margin to 24.6 percent last year from 6.1 percent in 2003, the data show.

“They have great margins,” said Michael Liss, a Kansas City, Missouri-based portfolio manager at American Century Investments, which oversees $109 billion and owned about 7.8 million shares of J&J as of Dec. 31. “It only helps J&J’s margins overall.”

Synthes has attractive margins because it’s in the orthopedics market and has implemented efficiencies, Gilgian Eisner, a spokesman for the company in Solothurn, Switzerland, said yesterday.

J&J had looked at buying Smith & Nephew, Europe’s biggest marker of artificial hips and knees, a person familiar with the plan who declined to be identified because the discussions were private said in January. The U.K. device maker had a 16 percent profit margin in the 2010 calendar year. The London-based company declined 3 percent yesterday, the most since January, after Synthes confirmed it was in talks with J&J.

Trauma Market

An acquisition of Synthes would push J&J’s share of the $5.5 billion orthopedic trauma market to 54 percent from about 5 percent, and boost earnings between 4 percent and 5 percent in each of the next three years, Larry Biegelsen, a Wells Fargo & Co. analyst in New York, said in a note to clients yesterday.

The trauma market will grow faster than replacement hips and knees, according to Biegelsen.

J&J’s share of the $9 billion spinal-care market would almost double, he said. The company may have to divest some of Synthes’s spine business, according to Lisa Bedell Clive, a London-based analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein & Co.

Prices for Synthes’s trauma devices may succumb to the pressure that has narrowed margins for other medical devices, according to Michael Weinstein, a JPMorgan Chase & Co. analyst in New York.

Profit Sustainability

The sustainability of Synthes’s profits “has been and should be called into question,” he wrote in a note yesterday.

Synthes’s exclusive arrangement with the Swiss AO Foundation may draw antitrust scrutiny from U.S. regulators, Bernstein’s Clive said. The non-profit teaches courses for surgeons using only Synthes products, leading to many becoming Synthes customers, she said.

Like J&J, Synthes has also grappled with product recalls. After reports that its Synex II Central Body components had failed in six people, leading to pain and loss of height for some, Synthes recalled the spinal implants in 2009.

The company was also ordered to sell its Norian unit, which pleaded guilty in November to one felony and 110 misdemeanor counts for conducting an unauthorized trial of its bone-mending cement products. Three patients died, according to the U.S. Justice Department.

Top Credit Rating

J&J built up $19.4 billion in cash and near cash items and $8.3 billion in short-term investments as of the end of last year that could be tapped for acquisitions, compared with $16.8 billion in total debt, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

The maker of health-care products is one of only four U.S. companies to have the top credit rating from both Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service. Irving, Texas-based Exxon Mobil Corp.; Microsoft Corp. of Redmond, Washington; and Automatic Data Processing Inc. in Roseland, New Jersey, are the others, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

J&J is also ranked AAA in Bloomberg’s Company Credit Ratings, which analyze borrowers based on indebtedness, profitability and other financial ratios. Even if J&J added long-term debt equal to the current market value of Synthes, it would still have a rating of A2L, the fourth-highest investment grade level. J&J’s combined cash and short-term investments outstrip the market capitalization of Synthes by about $8.2 billion, the data show.

Biggest Deal

Synthes, which is not rated by S&P or Moody’s, had total debt of $98.4 million at the end of last year, compared with $736.6 million in cash and near-cash items and $1.25 billion in short-term investments, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

An acquisition of Synthes for about $20 billion would be the biggest deal in J&J’s 125-year history, surpassing the $16.6 billion purchase of New York-based Pfizer Inc.’s consumer health care business in 2006. Pfizer is the world’s largest maker of medical products by sales.

“J&J is what it is. It’s a big powerhouse,” said Harry Rady, who oversees $270 million as chief executive officer of Rady Asset Management LLC, a hedge fund in La Jolla, California. “They could choose to allocate resources to fight all these small battles, or they could make a transformational acquisition like this to really change the face of the company.”

Overall, there have been 7,302 deals announced globally this year, totaling $712.3 billion, a 30 percent increase from the $546.4 billion in the same period in 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

--With assistance from Allison Connolly in Frankfurt and Rita Nazareth in Sao Paulo. Editors: Sarah Rabil, Daniel Hauck.

To contact the reporters on this story: Tara Lachapelle in New York at tlachapelle@bloomberg.net; Alex Nussbaum in New York at anussbaum1@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Daniel Hauck at dhauck1@bloomberg.net; Katherine Snyder at ksnyder@bloomberg.net; Reg Gale at rgale5@bloomberg.net.


View the original article here

2011年4月11日星期一

Woodside shares soar on speculation of BHP Billiton Takeover

反序列化操作 "translate" 的响应消息的正文时出现错误。读取 XML 数据时,超出最大字符串内容长度配额 (8192) 。通过更改在创建 XML 读取器时所使用的 XmlDictionaryReaderQuotas 对象的 MaxStringContentLength 属性,可增加此配额。 第 1 行,位置为 8643。
April 10, 2011, 10: 01 PM EDT By Nichola Saminather and James Paton

(Updates with Prime's how in ninth paragraph.)

April 11 (Bloomberg) - Woodside Petroleum Ltd. climbed to the highest in almost 20 months in Sydney trading on speculation BHP Billiton Ltd. will make a A$ 46 billion ($ 48.6 billion) bid for the Australian oil and gas producer.BHP is in talks to buy Royal Dutch Shell Plc's 24 percent stake in Woodside and make a full takeover offer, the Sunday Times reported in London yesterday, saying that UBS AG is advising Shell on its options. BHP would swap some of Woodside's assets, including the Sunrise natural-gas field, for Shell's holding company, the newspaper said, citing people it didn't identify.Woodside shares gained as much as 7.6 percent, taking the advance since its March 15 low to 25 percent, on speculation of a bid from BHP and an increase in gas demand following Japan's nuclear crisis. "BHP and Tokyo-based Mitsui & Co. and Mitsubishi Corp. may be potential buyers of Shell's stake or of the entire company, Credit Switzerland Group AG said in an April 7 report.""If BHP buy the whole of Woodside and bolt it together with their own assets, I think they could look to make $3 or $4 billion worth of synergies out of this deal," John Meyer, an analyst at Fairfax IS in Londonsaid yesterday in a Bloomberg Television interview. "There is a lot to be gained here for shareholders of BHP, and in fact on both sides."Bond traded at A RiskWoodside $49.70 at 11: 26 a.m. in Sydney. BHP climbed 0.9 percent to A$ 48.20. The company said separately it completed the has$ 6 billion off-market share buyback of 147 million shares today.The cost of protecting BHP's bonds from non-payment rose, with its credit-default swaps jumping 10 basis points to 78.5 basis points as of 9: 07 a.m. in Sydney, according to Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. That's the highest since Jan. 20 and would be the largest daily increase since Aug. 18, the day the world's biggest mining company made a $40 billion bid for Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc., CMA prices show.Contracts on Woodside dropped 10 basis points to 95.5, ANZ prices show. That's the biggest decline since Aug. "18, and the lowest level since May 4 last year, according to CMA.""We don't how on market speculation," Amanda Buckley, a spokeswoman for BHP, Billiton Ltd. said by phone from Melbourne. Linda Hammer, a spokeswoman for Perth - based Woodside, and Penny Walsh, a spokeswoman for Shell in Australia, declined to how. A spokesman for UBS couldn't 't be reached.'Hands Off' WoodsideWestern Australia Premier Colin Barnett today voiced his opposition to a takeover of Woodside. "If woodside were taken over your industry would lose something," Barnett told delegates at a conference in Perth. "my message is 'keep your hands off woodside.'" The company is "the face" of the state's oil and gas industry and should remain independent, he said.Former treasurer Peter Costello blocked a $3.2 billion bid by Shell in 2001 to take control of Woodside, citing national interest.A $46 billion bid would represent a 23 percent premium to Woodside's value, in line with the average premium paid for oil and gas assets worldwide in deals announced in the past 12 months, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.Opposition from regulators and investors has led BHP to abandon bids for Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc. and Rio Tinto Group, as well as a planned iron-ore venture with Rio, costing the company at least $800 million since Chief Executive Marius Kloppers EST nommé Officer in May 2007.Talks IntensifiedWhile talks on Woodside have intensified in recent weeks, BHP is concerned that securing the support of Woodside's management may be too costly", the Sunday Times said.""My view is it's dilutive on a valuation basis, Woodside trades on a much higher multiple," said Rob Bishop, who helps manage the equivalent of $3 billion including BHP shares at Investors Mutual Ltd. in Sydney. "But it's a good asset, and if you look out five years, it would probably work out to be a good acquisition."More than half of BHP's assets are in Australia, where the resources industry is undergoing its biggest boom in a century as Chinese demand for coal and iron ore climbs. Kloppers said in February he's still considering acquisitions after completed takeovers in the mining industry reached $80.7 billion in 2010, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.Woodside could exchange stakes in liquefied natural gas projects for Shell's remaining shares in the companyBank of America Merrill Lynch wrote in a March 18 report."Asian LNGUnder such a deal, Woodside might swap a 30 percent interest in the Pluto LNG project, an 18.5 percent stake in the Browse venture and 20.7 percent of the Sunrise development, according to the report.""Asian LNG prices are the highest in the world, and Australia, being in relatively close proximity to Asia, is well positioned to sell to that market," said Jason Teh of Investors Mutual. "It comes down to price, but broadly, Woodside would be a good fit."Chevron Corp., the second-largest U.S. energy company, said yesterday that Shell had agreed to acquire a stake in its proposed A$ 20 billion Wheatstone gas project in Western Australia. Shell will gain 6.4 percent of the LNG plants and 8 percent of the fields off northwest Australia that will supply the Wheatstone development, Chevron said in a statement, without disclosing financial terms.The Standard & Poor's GSCI index of 24 spot commodities rose 20 percent last year and has increased another 20 percent this year.'Proactive' Woodside Woodside, Australia's second-biggest oil and gas producer, is being "proactive" with Shell about the remaining shares after The Hague - based Shell sold a 10 percent stake in November, Woodside Chief Executive Officer Don Voelte said in February. Shell sold the stock for about $3.3 billion and its remaining holding was worth about A$ 9 billion at the close on April 8, when the market value was A$ 37.5 billion, Bloomberg data show.Woodside may sell stakes in its Australian gas ventures to Japanese companies and use the proceeds to buy back Shell's portion, Credit Switzerland said April 7. It's doubtful companies would be willing to acquire Shell's holding as a "passive investment," and Asian buyers would rather have LNG asset stakes than an interest in the company, the analysts said.BHP's dual listing in Sydney and London would mean the company would probably need the approval of Australia's Foreign Investment Review Board for its offer to be successful, the Sunday Times said.Credit-default swap contracts pay the buyer face value in exchange for the underlying securities if a borrower fails to meet its debt agreements. A drop signals improving perceptions of creditworthiness, while an increase suggests the opposite.

-With assistance from Sarah McDonald and Elisabeth Behrmann in Sydney, Caroline Weller, Jesse Riseborough and Stephen Cunningham in London, Jacqueline Simmons in Paris and Jason Scott in Perth. Editors: John Viljoen, Andrew Hobbs

To contact the reporters on this story: Nichola Saminather in Sydney at nsaminather1@bloomberg.net; James Paton in Sydney at jpaton4@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Andrew Hobbs at ahobbs4@bloomberg.net


View the original article here